Documentation
PickWise workflow
Connect once, begin your ticket, code with the standard, then log what happened.
Before you start
- API key from the portal → API keys
- Your work email — the same address you use to sign in to the portal
- MCP in your IDE — follow IDE setup for config templates
Keep your API key in IDE config only — never paste it into chat or task prompts.
At a glance
- Connect PickWise in your IDE once (API key + your portal email).
- Begin the ticket you are working on — the standard loads automatically.
- Code. No PickWise calls needed while you implement.
- Optional: save a private task note before pausing (max 3000 characters) — restored on Begin task.
- Log the session when you are done — decisions, recommendations, summary.
- Optional: add QA, PM, or other follow-up summaries in separate logs.
Tool details: Tools
Steps
-
1
Connect PickWise
Add PickWise to your IDE once. Your admin gives you an API key; use the same email you use to sign in to the portal.
-
2
Begin your task
Tell your agent which ticket you are on. PickWise loads the published standard, decisions, and task context.
Optional first step: list your tasks if you need names and descriptions before choosing.
-
3
Code with the standard
The agent applies your task, project, and org standards while coding. Optional: ask PickWise when you need org-wide context beyond the task standard.
Task notes are private resume scratch space (max 3000 characters) — not Sessions evidence and not shown in the portal.
Tools:
pickwise_save_task_note,pickwise_ask -
4
Log the session
Log which decisions were applied, any standard gaps as recommendations, and a short summary.
By default your summary can be posted to the linked ticket. Turn off ticket sync if it should stay in PickWise only.
Tools:
pickwise_log_session -
5
Review in Sessions
In the portal, open Sessions to see your runs — decisions, notes, recommendations, and summaries.
Optional follow-up summaries
Separate logs for QA, PM, or other audiences — same task, each with its own summary.
-
1
Standard recommendations
Note anything you had to guess because the standard was unclear.
How to log
Submit each gap as a recommendation on your main standards close-out (pickwise_log_session, session_kind standards).
Copy for your agent
Before closing the session, review the task standard for gaps. For each gap where you had to assume or work around missing guidance: - What you assumed or did - Why the current standard was unclear or silent - What decision should be added so the next developer does not guess -
2
QA handoff
What was delivered, what tests already cover, and what QA should verify manually.
How to log
Log as a separate session: session_kind qa_handoff.
Copy for your agent
Write a QA handoff section for the session summary. Cover: 1. What was delivered (behaviour, endpoints, UI, config) 2. What is already verified by automated tests — be specific 3. What QA should focus on manually: edge cases, auth, validation, errors, and anything tests do not cover -
3
PM assurance
Complete vs partial vs not done — with a clear readiness call.
How to log
Log as a separate session: session_kind pm_assurance.
Copy for your agent
Write a PM assurance section focused on feature completeness. State clearly: complete, partial, and not done — with a readiness line (Ready for QA, Ready for demo, or Not yet ready for production). -
4
Perspective summary
End user, competitor, and ops lenses on what you shipped.
How to log
Log as a separate session: session_kind perspective.
Copy for your agent
Write a perspective summary with three sections: **End user** — What would a real user notice? Bullets + Verdict: one line. **Competitor** — How does this compare to strong products? Bullets + Verdict: one line. **Ops / on-call** — Debuggability, alerts, failure modes. Bullets + Verdict: one line. -
5
Prompt feedback
Optional rating of how useful the task prompt was — separate from your main log.
How to log
Log as a separate session: session_kind prompt_feedback.
Copy for your agent
Rate how effective the task prompt was. Include Rating 1–10, **What went well**, and **What to improve**.